In all analyses statistical significance was set at p Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by Analytical study General linear patterns was used for linear regression data (Pearson’s Roentgen correlation) to evaluate the fresh relationship from urinary Na + and you can K + removal having SBP. To own Figs. 2 and you may step three, two-means ANOVA having Tukey’s article hoc was did to compare SBP one of several communities outlined on the basis of urinary Na + and K + excretion. So you’re able to quantify the effectiveness of increasing urinary Na + and you will K + removal according to SBP, Cohn’s Feeling Dimensions is actually calculated. In the Figs. cuatro and you can 5 generalized Pearson’s R relationship try performed to evaluate the latest organization of one’s urinary Na + :K + removal proportion having SBP. Within the Fig. 6 analysis was indeed reviewed of the a good three-method ANOVA together with pairwise comparisons have been made having fun with Tukey’s post hoc try. During the Fig. eight cousin regularity distribution try assessed playing with a good Gaussian fit studies. 05 (GraphPad prism app, adaptation 8). Data is actually displayed while the imply ± SD. Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of 99 g/go out, thinking revealed as imply ± SD. b Correlation out-of standard SBP (dependent variable) across the whole assortment urinary potassium removal (independent variable), (Pearson’s Roentgen dos for salt sensitive and painful = 0.001 and you can salt resistant = 0.008), in sodium sensitive and painful (letter = 186) and you can sodium resistant (letter = 222) anybody. Baseline SBP according to urinary sodium so you’re able to potassium excretion ratio (Na + /K + ) (a) correlation off standard SBP (situated adjustable) over the entire selection of urinary Na + /K + excretion (separate adjustable), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 getting salt painful and sensitive = 0.0004 and you can salt resistant = 0.0016) (b) baseline SBP predicated on alterations in salt excretion and you may potassium excretion variety from inside the sodium delicate (letter = 186) and you can salt resistant (n = 222) individuals at assessment on the typical eating plan, beliefs revealed as the suggest ± SD. Studies had been analyzed because of the about three-means ANOVA which have pairwise analysis followed by Tukey’s article hoc sample. Relationship of SBP viewpoints over the whole list of urinary sodium so you can potassium excretion (Na + /K + ) proportion inside salt painful and sensitive (letter = 71) and you will sodium resistant (letter = 119) those with diet intervention of your Weight loss Remedies for End Hypertension (DASH) (a) higher sodium (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen dos for salt sensitive = 0.04 and you may salt unwilling = 0.04) (b) reduced sodium (LS) diet plan, (Pearson’s Roentgen dos for sodium painful and sensitive = 0.02 and you will sodium unwilling = 0.00002).

In all analyses statistical significance was set at p < 0

Salt sensitive: Participants with SBP being at least 5 mmHg higher after HS intake compared to the values after the LS intake; Salt resistant: Participants whose SBP differed by <5 mmHg between HS and LS intakes; Independent variables: Urinary Na + , Urinary K + and Na + :K + excretion ratio; Dependent variable: SBP; Categorical variable: Participants were categorized into groups on the basis of increments of 1 g/day in urinary Na + and K + excretion to evaluate the linear trends

Analytical study

General linear patterns was used for linear regression data (Pearson’s Roentgen correlation) to evaluate the fresh relationship from urinary Na + and you can K + removal having SBP. To own Figs. 2 and you may step three, two-means ANOVA having Tukey’s article hoc was did to compare SBP one of several communities outlined on the basis of urinary Na + and K + excretion. So you’re able to quantify the effectiveness of increasing urinary Na + and you will K + removal according to SBP, Cohn’s Feeling Dimensions is actually calculated. In the Figs. cuatro and you can 5 generalized Pearson’s R relationship try performed to evaluate the latest organization of one’s urinary Na + :K + removal proportion having SBP. Within the Fig. 6 analysis was indeed reviewed of the a good three-method ANOVA together with pairwise comparisons have been made having fun with Tukey’s post hoc try. During the Fig. eight cousin regularity distribution try assessed playing with a good Gaussian fit studies. 05 (GraphPad prism app, adaptation 8). Data is actually displayed while the imply ± SD.

Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes potassium excretion for salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) group, slope for salt sensitive and salt resistant group is indicated for the potassium excretion range <1–1

Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) at screening on regular diet (a) according to changes sodium excretion of <5 g/day, in salt sensitive (n = 154) and salt resistant (n = 180) group, slope of the for salt sensitive group is indicated for the sodium excretion ranges of <2–2.99 g/day, 3–3.99 g/day and 4–4.99 g/day (b) Correlation of baseline SBP (dependent variable) across the entire range of urinary sodium excretion (independent variable), (Pearson's R 2 for salt sensitive = 0.02 and for salt resistant = 0.02), in salt sensitive (n = 186) and salt resistant (n = 222) individuals.

99 g/go out, thinking revealed as imply ± SD. b Correlation out-of standard SBP (dependent variable) across the whole assortment urinary potassium removal (independent variable), (Pearson’s Roentgen dos for salt sensitive and painful = 0.001 and you can salt resistant = 0.008), in sodium sensitive and painful (letter = 186) and you can sodium resistant (letter = 222) anybody.

Baseline SBP according to urinary sodium so you’re able to potassium excretion ratio (Na + /K + ) (a) correlation off standard SBP (situated adjustable) over the entire selection of urinary Na + /K + excretion (separate adjustable), (Pearson’s Roentgen 2 getting salt painful and sensitive = 0.0004 and you can salt resistant = 0.0016) (b) baseline SBP predicated on alterations in salt excretion and you may potassium excretion variety from inside the sodium delicate (letter = 186) and you can salt resistant (n = 222) individuals at assessment on the typical eating plan, beliefs revealed as the suggest ± SD. Studies had been analyzed because of the about three-means ANOVA which have pairwise analysis followed by Tukey’s article hoc sample.

Relationship of SBP viewpoints over the whole list of urinary sodium so you can potassium excretion (Na + /K + ) proportion inside salt painful and sensitive (letter = 71) and you will sodium resistant (letter = 119) those with diet intervention of your Weight loss Remedies for End Hypertension (DASH) (a) higher sodium (HS), (Pearson’s Roentgen dos for salt sensitive = 0.04 and you may salt unwilling = 0.04) (b) reduced sodium (LS) diet plan, (Pearson’s Roentgen dos for sodium painful and sensitive = 0.02 and you will sodium unwilling = 0.00002).