† Without and with adjustment for BMI. Simple adjusted includes covariates for registry site (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79 przeglÄ…d hot or not, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), with and without BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ).
‡ Fully adjusted model includes covariates for registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded.
§ P really worth off Wald figure to evaluate to own a total feeling from categorical BI-RADS thickness. All the statistical evaluating was indeed a couple of-sided.
Regardless if BI-RADS occurrence don’t customize threat of cancer of the breast passing from inside the link to most other pathological situations, females that have BI-RADS 1 thickness had a tendency to feel the high exposure, in any stratum
¶ AJCC stage is included once the an effective categorical covariate from inside the activities that have every levels shared, with and you may in the place of phase IV.
Success model outcomes for the latest family ranging from mammographic thickness and risk from breast cancer death, total by AJCC stage*
* AJCC = American Mutual Committee to the Disease; BI-RADS = Breast Imaging Reporting and you may Data System; Body mass index = body mass index; CI = depend on period; Hour = possibility ratio. N = 96 people excluded regarding the lead to-particular models.
† Without and with adjustment for BMI. Simple adjusted includes covariates for registry site (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), with and without BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ).
‡ Fully adjusted model includes covariates for registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded.
§ P well worth regarding Wald statistic to check having a complete impact regarding categorical BI-RADS occurrence. All of the statistical tests have been a couple of-sided.
Even when BI-RADS density didn’t personalize chance of breast cancer passing within the link to most other pathological circumstances, girls that have BI-RADS 1 density tended to feel the large risk, in every stratum
¶ AJCC phase is included just like the an excellent categorical covariate in the designs with every levels combined, which have and you may as opposed to stage IV.
Certainly one of lady that have tumors with a minimum of dos.0cm, BI-RADS 1 thickness is in the an increased risk of breast cancer demise (Hours = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.14 so you’re able to dos.09; P = .003 to have overall effectation of BI-RADS density; Table 4). Women that had both BI-RADS step one density and you will higher-degree tumors got a heightened risk of cancer of the breast passing (Hours = 1.45, 95% CI = step 1.05 so you’re able to 2.02; P = .thirteen to possess overall effectation of occurrence).
Endurance model results for the newest relation anywhere between mammographic occurrence and you can exposure out-of cancer of the breast death, stratified because of the cyst properties, AJCC levels We–IV joint*
* N = 96 women excluded from cause-specific models. Fully adjusted model includes covariates for AJCC stage (I, IIA, IIB, III, IV), registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), body mass index (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded. AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer; BI-RADS = Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System; CI = confidence interval; ER = estrogen receptor; HR = hazard ratio; PR = progesterone receptor.