Supporters of your unidimensional strategy concern the need for this kind regarding group for the factor that it is not certain whether or not they give you a much better understanding of person habits and that they can unknown the image ( Lukaszewski, 2010 twenty-two. Lukaszewski , W . ( 2010 ). Udreka zycia. [torment of lives] . Sopot : Smak slowa . ). Inside their view, the analysis of its effects towards the casual human life is more very important than identifying the resources of this new FOPD, as in the study in line with the terror administration principle (Solomon, Greenberg, & Pyszczynski, 2015). Ergo, it could be concluded that no matter what correctly i explain the object of your FOPD, two main points are still a comparable: the fact that we experience concern plus the simple fact that from inside the all cases it concerns death-the fresh new fragility from human existence. In comparison, Yalom (2008b) believes one to demise stress is actually a mixture of collection of, pretty much specific, fears, amongst which the central concern is worries regarding individual annihilation-the fear of ceasing to survive. Contained in this consider, it’s legitimate so you’re able to are convinced that the 2 tactics (unidimensional and you will multidimensional) don’t exclude one another but enable it to be a far greater knowledge of various other servings away from human life in which the FOPD works an crucial setting. Inside construction of the FOPD, it is possible to differentiate each other a broad aspect and you may good level of specific models that make it up; the new facets that needs to be the focus have decided from the objectives plus the precision of your tool put.
A comparison of fuck swipe for your family classifications implies, first of all, any particular one brand of FOPD (elizabeth
g., concern about life immediately following passing, anxiety about the whole process of passing away or anxiety about the body immediately after death) exist on their own of implemented identity requirement, and you may furthermore, that the sort of FOPD which can be celebrated while the independent in the one to group could be found in most other classifications on diversity out-of even more broadly defined type of FOPD ( Ochsmann, 1993 29. Ochsmann , R . ( 1993 ). Anxiety vor tod und sterben. Beitrage zur thanato-psychologie. [concern with death and dying. Contributions so you can thanatopsychology ] . Gottingen : Hogrefe . ). Eg findings recommend an effective hierarchical construction of the FOPD.
And there’s discrepancies regarding literary works with the meaning and you will structure of the FOPD, the goal of today’s study were to look at it when you look at the an even more nuanced ways, on the Furcht vor Tod und auch Sterben Fragebogen (Dying and you will Perishing Nervousness Collection, FVTS) just like the an enthusiastic empirical example. Even more especially, we hypothesised one to (a) the fresh new inconsistencies and you may inconsistent results in past look have been due to the current presence of all round concern about dying foundation, which is meaningfully classified to the specific different the brand new FOPD; and you may (b) the latest FOPD create end up in has actually a great hierarchical framework. To check on whether or not the design of the FVTS made-up the general anxiety about death also alot more particular kinds of FOPD, i did a good bi-factor confirmatory basis analysis. To test whether the design of your FOPD is hierarchical inside characteristics, i went a series of exploratory structural equation habits since suggested within the Goldberg’s (2006) 13. Goldberg , L. Roentgen . ( 2006 ). Carrying it out all of the trout-ackwards: The development of the brand new hierarchical basis formations about finest down . Log out of Research into the Identification , 40 , 347 – 358 . . top-off process.
Members and you can techniques
The study was conducted in central, eastern and southern Poland on a group of 1217 people (602 women and 615 men) between 18 and 89 years of age ( M Age = ; SD Age = ). The sample consisted of people in the following age ranges: between 18 and 23 years old ( M Age = ; SD Age = 1.79), constituting 35%; between 24 and 40 years old ( M Age = ; SD Age = 4.98), constituting 38%; between 41 and 59 years old ( M Age = ; SD Age = 4.95), constituting 16%; and over 60 years old ( M Age = ; SD Age = 5.74), constituting 3%. There was no data on age for 8% of the sample. Twenty-nine per cent of participants had a secondary education, 23% had an elementary education (17% of them were secondary school students) and 23% had a higher education. We did not obtain information on 25% of the participants’ education level.